Accessibility Statement for Prio - a tool for substitution

Table of Contents:

The Swedish Chemicals Agency is responsible for this service. We want as many people as possible to be able to use our services. This page describes how Prio - a tool for substitution complies with the Act on Accessibility to Digital Public Services, any known accessibility issues, and how you can report problems to us so that we can address them.

How accessible is Prio - a tool for substitution?


Vi är medvetna om att delar av tjänsten inte är helt tillgängliga.

What can you do if you cannot use parts of the service?

If you discover accessibility issues in this service, please let us know.

If you require content from the service that is not accessible to you, you may contact us to request the information in an accessible format. This also applies to content that is exempt from the scope of the law.

You can contact us in the following ways:

Report accessibility issues

We are constantly striving to improve the accessibility of our services. If you encounter issues not described on this page, or if you believe we are not meeting the requirements of the law, please let us know so we are aware of the problem.

You can contact us in the following ways:

Supervision

The Agency for Digital Government is responsible for supervising compliance with the Act on Accessibility to Digital Public Services. If you are not satisfied with how we handle your feedback, you can contact the Agency for Digital Government External link. and bring it to their attention.

Technical information about the accessibility of the service

This service is partially compliant with the Act on Accessibility to Digital Public Services. Known deficiencies are described below.

Content that is not accessible

Non-compliance when using screen readers

  • Functions and content are not fully accessible when using screen readers.
  • Some interactive elements lack clear names or roles.
  • The structure and hierarchy of the content are not consistently marked up.

Non-compliance for users with low vision

  • Colour contrast does not always meet the required standards.
  • It is not always clear what is selected or active.

Non-compliance when using a keyboard

  • Not all parts of the tool can be used using a keyboard alone.
  • Focus is not managed consistently across different parts.
  • Functionality based on drag-and-drop lacks accessible alternatives.

Issues affecting understandability and usability

  • It may be difficult to understand how to proceed within the tool.
  • Feedback on selections or errors is sometimes unclear.

Non-compliance in code and structure

  • The code has deficiencies in its semantic structure.
  • ARIA implementations are incomplete or inconsistent.
  • Dynamic content is updated without this always being communicated to assistive technologies.

How we tested the service

The most recent assessment was conducted on 23 February 2026 by an external consultant.

This accessibility statement was last updated on 10 April 2026.

Last published 13 April 2026